Crusade and Revolution: The Spanish Civil War 1936-1939 Deluxe 2nd Edition is a card-driven point-to-point movement strategic-operational wargame that covers all the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939). Its rules are based on Ted Raicer’s Paths of Glory. Each player takes command of one of the sides (Nationalist or Republican), and looks after all the aspects that involve a war including mobilization, recruitment, movement of troops, offensives and construction of defenses. There are also historical events that must be taken into consideration, thinks such as foreign military aid, international policy, change of Republican Government, etc.
An Impossible War: The First Carlist War in the North, 1834-1838 from Bellica Third Generation is a block wargame that recreates the First Carlist War in the North of Spain which was a civil war between the Carlists who supported the succession of the late king’s brother Carlos de Borbón and the progressive and centralist supporters of the regent Maria Christina acting for Isabella II of Spain who were referred to as the Liberals. The game uses blocks representing units but also includes counters and uses cards. I was able to play the game about a month or so ago with Francisco Ronco who owns the publishing company Bellica Third Generation and very much enjoyed the game and how it represented this interesting struggle.
In this series of Action Points, we will first take a look at the Game Map, discussing the point-to-point movement configuration, the various spaces and the delineation of the Carlist versus the Liberal Zones, as well as explain the use of the Rest of Spain smaller map, examine the units available to both sides and cover the importance of Supply, take a look at the Carlist Uprising Phase and what it means for the game, take a look at the activation system and the use of Action Point Markers, and cover some examples of Battle, focusing on the tactical aspect of combat with the use of the Battlefield Board, as well as an example of a Siege.
Main Game Map
There is a Main Game Map, which is commonly referred to as the Northern Map, shows the northernmost tier of Spain along the coast of the Cantabrian Sea including Navarre, the Basque Provinces and part of Cantabria, Burgos and La Rioja, and a small secondary Game Map that reflects the regions of the rest of the country, where Carlist uprisings break out and the expeditions sent from the North may operate.
The Main Game Map contains various elements including named settlements, such as Towns and Cities, and also identify key Carlist Refuges and has a clear demarcation of Carlist and Liberal territory. There are locations identified by the name of a settlement or area, which can be of greater or lesser importance and size. There are four types of spaces including Cities, Main Towns, Carlist Refuges and Other Spaces.
Cities
Cities are represented on the Game Map by an octagonal shape and the name of the city is capitalized. If the City is Liberal it will be colored turquoise and if it leans Carlist it is colored red. There are five Cities on the Game Map including Bilbao, San Sebastián, Vitoria, Pamplona, and Logroño. All of them have a permanent Fortress as well as an Intrinsic Garrison marker indicating the controlling side. Also, the Bilbao space has a Port, identified by the anchor symbol, because it is connected to the Cantabrian Sea via the River Nervión. If the Carlist player is besieging Bilbao, or controls or is besieging either of the two spaces located next to the river (Portugalete or Guecho), the Port of Bilbao is cancelled for the purposes of naval transport and supply.
Supply is also determined based on 2 things, a Region and then each of the Cities within that Region. A Region can supply up to 6 Liberal Infantry and Cavalry units. But, a Region does not supply any Carlist units, which must obtain supply from a Supply Train or Knapsack in the Region. Without a Supply Train or a Knapsack, in order for Carlist units to get supply they then must attempt to forage. Each space can supply a certain number of units, depending on whether the space is located in the Carlist or Liberal Zone, the type of space, and the side the units belong to. We will cover this a bit more in Action Point 2 when we discuss units.
A player will gain +3 VP’s for capturing a City during the game. These are the most important ways to score in the game and protecting them is vital to either side. It is also important to keep in mind that if the Carlist player ever gains control of 2 Cities at the same time that were initially held by the Liberal player, that player will immediately gain an automatic victory.
Connecting the various Cities and Towns are the Roads. Units can move along these roads and there are 2 types of Roads including Main Roads and Secondary Roads. The Main Roads are indicated by a continuous thick black line while Secondary Roads are indicated by dashed brown lines. The cost of moving along a Main Road is 1 Movement Point and along a Secondary Road is 2 Movement Points. I found it very important to properly plan out your movements to maximize the distance that you can gain with a single action. These roads are somewhat of a spiderweb connecting points and you can reach all points eventually but finding the best and most efficient route is important. Studying the Game Map and the layout of the roads is key to playing the game well as you can block off the use of certain Main Roads and force your opponent ot move much slower on Secondary Roads frustrating their plans and efforts.
Main Towns
Main Towns are generally populated areas that have some political, economic or strategic importance and are identified on the board with a hexagonal shape that is of a similar size and proportion as the Cities. Also, the name of the town will be capitalized the same as the Cities. If the Main Town is Liberal it will be colored turquoise and if it leans Carlist it is colored red.
A player will gain +1 VP for capturing a Main Town that was held by the other side. These are not as valuable as the Cities but there are more of these on the Game Map than the Cities with 13 Main Towns as compared to only 5 Cities. Prioriting their capture and control is important for many purposes such as Supply, movement and being able to avoid interceptions and
Carlist Refuge
There are 2 Carlist Refuges identified on the Game Map including Améscoas and Baztán. These are spaces where the Carlists are particularly favored by geography and local popular support. Neither player may construct fortresses in these spaces. These Refuges are identified with a square with an X at the top and a dashed brown line.
Carlist Zones and Liberal Zones
The Carlist Zones take up a considerable portion of the Game Map which is denoted with a red shaded background and a dotted red line. All locations within it are considered to be in the Carlist Zone, while all locations outside of it are considered to be in the Liberal Zone. Also, spaces adjacent to the Carlist Zone are spaces belonging to the Liberal Zone, but that are connected via a road to any space within the Carlist Zone.
The Carlist units in the game are tied to specific localities—Navarre, the Basque Provinces, or “Castilians”—rather than a standard, monolithic national army and are numerically outnumbered by the Liberals. As such, they have a clear need to be nimble and move around the board causing difficulties. One of the ways the Carlist player scores Victory Points through the increase in Prestige is by is controlling at least 4 spaces with at least 4 units. If there are at least four Liberal infantry or Cavalry units in the same space in the Carlist Zone 1 is subtracted from the sum of besieged Cities and active Expedition.
Essentially, the zone embodies the “Impossible War” by forcing the Carlist player to maximize localized, high-quality forces in their home territory against a numerically superior foe. The Carlist player increases their Prestige by besieging cities and launching expeditions. They also benefit from the growing Carlist uprising in the rest of Spain. The Liberal player will be busy countering Carlist Prestige, putting down uprisings, and hunting down expeditions. They have the advantage that, in the long run, war fatigue will affect the enemy.
The terrain is simple with each space containing rough or open terrain, depending on the relief of its area. Much of the northern geography was rugged, which played an important role in favor of Carlism, as it mitigated three of the advantages of government troops: their superiority in numbers, cavalry, and artillery.
The spaces at the western, southern, and eastern ends of the map have connections to regions on the map of the rest of Spain, which can be used to move from one map to another.
Finally, the Game Map includes various game tables (Year, Turn, Initiative, Victory Points, Carlist Prestige, etc.), as well as a lot of information about commonly used rules, so players don’t need to consult the rulebook that often.
Rest of Spain Smaller Map
The map of the Regions of Spain is smaller and simpler. It consists of nine large regions that cover large territories. This map’s purpose is to record the spread of the Carlist uprisings, to enable Carlist expeditions to operate and for the Liberal player to hunt them down. We will take a closer look at the Carlist Uprising Phase in a later post but I wanted to show you the map so you understand its layout.
I very much enjoyed An Impossible War, even though I played just a few turns of a smaller scenario with Francisco Ronco. He was a master at the game, as obviously as the publisher and a playtester he is intimately familiar with the rules and strategies, and I learned a lot from him about how the game should be played. I am looking forward to future plays as the game is just very good and has some interesting aspects that create a very tense and interesting game of maneuver and strategy. The Game Map is very well done, from an aesthetic perspective as well as functionally, and the board makes playing the game easier.
In Action Point 2, we will examine the units available to both sides and cover the importance of Supply.
Die Netflix-Doku "Mein Lehrer, der Krake" fasziniert seit Erscheinung in 2020 Millionen Zuschauer*innen von den vielfältigen und lebenswerten Oktopoden. Kelp basiert als Brettspiel auf genau diesem Film und der faszinierenden Geschichte dahinter, setzt den Fokus aber auf das alltägliche Duell im Kelp-Wald: Wird der Katzenhai den Achtarmigen aufspüren und töten oder entkommt der Oktopus durch geschickte Manöver? Ein außergewöhnliches Spiel in Konzept, Design und Mechanismus.
Kelp ein asymmetrisches Dull-Spiel von Carl Robinson für 2 Spieler*innen und dauert circa 40-60 Minuten.
[Spielmaterial: Absolute Welt(meer)-Klasse]
Wonderbow zählt mit Titeln wie Whispering Woods, Rebel Princess und Leaders zu den absoluten Qualitätsgaranten, was Design und Produkt-Qualität betrifft. Kelp schließt sich da nahtlos an und verdient jede Bestnote für die Komponenten.
Schon das Cover macht natürlich mit seiner starken Farbgebung und der spannenden, zwischen natürlich und fantastischen Illustration schwankenden Gestaltung etwas her. Hier schonmal Hut ab an den Künstler Weberson Santiago!
In der Schachtel erwartet euch dann ein 1A-Inlay mit einem Spielplan, diversen Karten, einem ganzen Beutel voller bunter Würfel, hochwertigen Mahjong-ähnlichen Spielsteinen und einer wunderschönen Hai-Miniatur. Das sieht alles großartig aus und gehört zu den absoluten Schönheiten der vielen Meeresspiele. Aber kann das Spiel auch mithalten oder ist das alles nur ein Balz-Tanz, um ahnungslosen Brettspieler*innen die Einkaufskörbe zu füllen?
[Spielablauf: Knallharte Asymmetrie]
So entspannt das Meer als Bade-Tourist*in in der Regel abläuft – als Meeresbewohner*in geht es hier fast täglich ums nackte Überleben. Wenn ihr euch von Kelp die Gemütlichkeit eines Sonnenuntergangs an der Nordsee erhofft, habt ihr euch im Spiel vertan. Hier erwartet euch von der ersten bis zur letzten Sekunde ein Katz-und-Maus-Spiel, bei dem fast jeder Zug über den Sieg entscheiden kann.
Dabei gibt es drei Szenarien, wie das Spiel ausgehen kann:
Der Hai gewinnt, weil er den Oktopus findet und frisst.
Der Oktopus gewinnt, weil er alle vier Futtersorten frisst.
Der Oktopus gewinnt, weil der Hai verhungert ist.
Ihr wählt also zu Beginn erstmal, wer welche Rolle übernimmt und setzt euch an die entsprechende Version am Spielplan. Dann erwarten euch zwei völlig unterschiedliche Spielerlebnisse.
[Der Oktopus: Acht Arme für ein Versteck]
Mit dem Oktopus ist euer Ziel: Überleben und im besten Fall auch etwas zu fressen zu bekommen. Als Meister der Tarnung wollt ihr euren Aufenthaltsort im Kelp-Riff im besten Fall gar nicht bekannt geben, ihr könnt aber auch taktisch mit euren Informationen umgehen.
Spielerisch löst ihr das mit den eingangs erwähnten Mahjong-Steinen. Auf denen sind Muscheln, Fallen, Futter oder euer Oktopus zu sehen. Neun dieser Plättchen stellt ihr auf die neun Sektoren des Spielplans – so herum, dass der Hai sie nicht sieht. Auf einem dieser Plättchen ist euer Oktopus zu sehen; Das ist euer Aufenthaltsort. Findet euch der Hai hier, kann er euch angreifen.
Mit Handkarten aus eurem Start-Deck könnt ihr:
die Steine in eurem Zug bewegen, aufdecken (dann sieht der Hai sie also auch), sie vertauschen oder mischen. Damit könnt ihr die Steine zu euren Gunsten legen.
neue Karten aus einer Auslage erlenen und euer Deck damit erweitern.
fressen, wenn euer Oktopus-Stein neben einem Futter-Stein steht.
Als Kosten für ausgespielte Karten müsst ihr jedoch immer eine bestimmte Anzahl an Steinen auf dem Spielbrett aufdecken. Heißt: Für jede eurer Aktionen gebt ihr dem Hai auch etwas über euren Aufenthaltsort preis.
[Der Hai: Kraken sind Futter, keine Freunde]
Als Hai tummelt ihr euch eingangs völlig unbefangen durch den Kelpwald, aber ihr habt vor allem ordentlich Kohldampf. Da könnte nichts so gut gegen das Magenkurren helfen wie ein glitschiger Oktopode. Als Hai bewegt ihr euch übers Spielfeld, könnt Verstecke aufdecken und angreifen. Spielerisch macht ihr das mit Hilfe eurer Würfel. Diese zieht ihr aus eurem Würfel und könnt verschiedene Dinge mit ihnen machen:
Blaue Würfel stellen Strömungen dar, mit denen ihr euch schneller bewegt
Gelbe Würfel sind zum Aufdecken der Steine da. So findet ihr mehr zu den Positionen heraus. Ihr könnt aber auch Pech haben und eine Falle erwischen, die euch dann einen Malus gibt.
Rote Würfel sind Angriffe, mit denen ihr den (vermeintlichen) Oktopus angreifen könnt.
Durch das Einsetzen von Würfeln könnt ihr neue Dauer-Aktionen freischalten, verbraucht aber auch Energie oder steigt in eurer Hunger-Skala nach oben. Ist die einmal voll, habt ihr verloren. Im besten Fall greift ihr also ein Feld an, wo auch der Oktopus steht. Dann kommt es zum Showdown: der Konfrontation.
[Die Konfrontation]
Bei der Konfrontation ist der Nervenkitzel entsprechend besonders hoch: Eine falsche Karte entscheidet über das Schicksal der beiden Meeresbewohner. Dafür haben beide Parteien drei Farbkarten zur Verfügung. Gleichzeitig und verdeckt wählt ihr je eine Karte aus. Dann deckt ihr sie auf 3…2…1… um!
Haben beide die gleiche Farbe gewählt – gewinnt der Hai Haben beide unterschiedliche Farben gewählt – macht der Oktopus ein Manöver und entkommt noch einmal
In letzterem Fall geht das Spiel weiter und der Oktopus kann die Aktion auf seiner Manöver-Karte ausführen. Dann wird die Karte und die entsprechende Farb-Karte des Hais aus dem Spiel genommen. Ihr habt also maximal drei Konfrontationen in der gesamten Partie. Bei der dritten gewinnt der Hai immer.
[Fazit: Nur was für heftige Konfrontationen unter Wasser]
Es gibt Duell-Spiele, da liegt der Fokus auf Wohlfühlen und dann gibt es Kelp. Wer sich gedanklich schon immer in einen wirklich spannenden Unterwasser-Kampf hineinversetzen wollte, wird mit diesem Spiel seine helle Freude haben.
Die Mischung aus erstklassiger Optik und spannender Asymmetrie führt zu einem einzigartigen Spielgefühl. Das Balancing der beiden Seiten wird dabei ab und an etwas hinterfragt: Während der Oktopus jeden Zug (fast) komplett in der Tentakel hat, muss der Hai auch auf Würfelglück vertrauen. Und das gleich doppelt: Durch das Ziehen der richtigen Würfel im richtigen Moment und auf die Augenzahlen selbst.
Kelp kann damit definitiv für Frust sorgen. Aber auf beiden Seiten! So kann eine Partie auch mal in der zweiten Runde vorbei gehen, wenn der Hai (durch Zufall oder Glück) das richtige Feld angreift und das Manöver des Oktopoden scheitert. Für den Hai kann es aber auch zu einem frustrierenden Hinterherschwimmen kommen, bei dem das Würfelglück einen Strich durch die Rechnung macht.
Dank der vielen Auflevel-Möglichkeiten sowohl bei Oktopus als auch bei Hai entsteht aber viel Raum für Anpassungen, für neue Taktiken, Strategien und Zwischenebenen.
Wer sich vor einer so hohen Konfrontationsdichte scheut, sollte Kelp trotz der tollen Optik lieber nicht an Land holen. Für Fans großer Duelle bringt Kelp das Hidden Movement Genre auf ein kompaktes, aber doch taktisches Niveau in wunderschönster Verpackung.
____________________________________________
Kelp von Carl Robinson Erschienen bei Wonderbow Für 2 Spielende in 40-60 Minuten ab 12 Jahren Boardgamegeek-Link
sämtliche Bilder sind von uns selbst erstellt oder vom jeweiligen Pressematerial des Verlages (hier Wonderbow)
*es handelt sich um einen Affiliate-Link. Für Euch entstehen keine weiteren Kosten. Wir erhalten eine Provision.
It’s Women’s Day! A great opportunity to look pair a book and a game on the American women’s suffrage struggle: The Woman’s Hour (Elaine Weiss) and Votes for Women (Tory Brown, Fort Circle).
The Woman’s Hour was published in 2018 by Viking Press. It focuses on the campaigns for and against Tennessee to ratify the 19th Amendment which enshrined women’s suffrage in the US constitution – as the 36th, and decisive, state to do so.
Votes for Women was published in 2022. It is Tory Brown’s first published board game. The card-driven game can be played in a solo or cooperative mode with the player(s) representing the American suffrage movement from 1848 to 1920 against an automated opposition, or with two to four players facing off against each other (half of them for, the other against women’s suffrage). In either case, the suffrage players must win 36 states (either by shoring them up decisively during the game, or in the final vote on ratification of the federal amendment) to win.
Connections & Conclusions
At first look, book and game seem to have very different scopes. After all, Votes for Women sets in with the Seneca Falls Convention (at which women’s suffrage was first voiced as a political demand in the United States) in 1848 and covers the following 72 years, whereas The Woman’s Hour begins with the arrival of activists Carrie Chapman Catt, Sue White, and Josephine Pearson at the Nashville station in the sweltering summer of 1920. Yet as the narrative progresses, background stories are woven into the tapestry – on the context of the 1920 presidential election, suffragists’ previous efforts to gain voting rights for women in the states and to lobby for a federal amendment, the women’s suffrage movement’s relationship with abolitionism, and all the way back to Seneca Falls (and a little bit of Abigail Adams’s “Remember the Ladies”). If you have played Votes for Women, you will recognize many of the people and events on the cards from the early and middle periods of the game when reading The Woman’s Hour.
The Seneca Falls Convention is the Start card for the suffragist player with which any game of Votes for Women kicks off, following the tradition laid out by protagonist Elizabeth Cady Stanton that this was the starting point of the American women’s suffrage movement.
What unites book and game is their focus on procedural politics. Historical change does not simply happen, nor is momentarily decided upon. Instead, it is brought into effect by the “strong, slow drilling into hardwood boards with passion as well as sound judgment” (Max Weber). The drills used come in both cases from the toolbox of political activism:
The Woman’s Hour details how suffragists (suffs) and anti-suffragists (antis) lobbied the Tennessee lawmakers, how they organized in associations and clubs to channel their activists’ time, funds, and energy, and, of course, how they campaigned for public opinion to win the hearts and minds of the American people with newspaper articles, public speeches, great processions, and all kinds of civil disobedience.
Votes for Women makes these the three actions from which the players choose on a given turn: Lobbying (for and against the 19th Amendment in Congress), organizing (to gain the crucial buttons which are the currency for some powerful in-game effects and die re-rolls), and campaigning (which spreads influence cubes and thus eventually decides if enough states come out in favor of ratification of the 19th Amendment or not).
Early in the game: There are still a lot of orange Opposition cubes, but the women’s suffrage movement has made some inroads (yellow and purple cubes). The large round buttons represent the movement’s organizational strength, the white columns (one already placed on the track under the picture of the Capitol) the willingness of Congress to pass the women’s suffrage amendment.
As we’ve mentioned civil disobedience already: The women’s suffrage movement was no monolithic bloc. One of the great dividing lines was that of styles: The more conventional part of the movement, organized in the late 19th and early 20th century in the National American Women’s Suffrage Association (NAWSA) led by Carrie Chapman Catt, paid close attention to appear as respectable as possible (knowing full well that their demand for equal suffrage was enough of a provocation to the male public opinion of the time). Others adopted a more radical style, inspired by the British suffragettes: The Women’s Party, led by Alice Paul (and represented in Tennessee by Sue White) referred to the president as “Kaiser Wilson” in reference to the German war enemy, burned him in effigy, and (successfully) provoked the police into arresting activists over minor infractions. The dainty young women and respectable matrons who served some prison time then embodied the injustice of depriving women of their vote.
The Woman’s Hour details these fractions within the movement, as NAWSA and the Women’s Party led entirely separate campaigns for Tennessee’s ratification of the 19th Amendment. While infighting was avoided, the reader is left to wonder if the movement could have been more effective if not for these parallel structures – or if the split between a more moderate and a more radical wing was able to compel a broader spectrum of audiences by working in parallel.
Votes for Women depicts the multifaceted character of the women’s suffrage movement by splitting the suffragist player into campaigner figures and influence of cubes of two colors (yellow/gold, the traditional color of the American women’s suffrage movement, and purple, a color which Alice Paul had coopted from the British suffrage movement). As several Opposition event cards target the highest concentration of one or the other color, the Suffragist player is well-advised to aim for an even spread of colors in the individual states.
The pluralism of the women’s suffrage movement is exemplified by the two colors… and a plethora of Opposition events which target only one or the other.
Votes for Women also tackles another split in the women’s suffrage movement which is outside the scope of The Woman’s Hour – that on strategy. After the initial push for women’s suffrage as a part of a great campaign for equal suffrage regardless of sex and race had failed in the aftermath of the Civil War, the suffragists disagreed on how to proceed: Some pushed for a federal amendment to the Constitution (like the 15th Amendment had codified the voting rights of black men), others wanted to win voting rights in the individual states first. While the struggle for women’s voting rights was eventually won with the ratification of the 19th Amendment in Tennessee, the voting rights advances in the individual states had laid the groundwork: Wyoming had established women’s suffrage as early as 1869, Montana sent Jeannette Rankin as the first woman to Capitol Hill, and by 1917, women in 19 states – mostly in the West and Midwest – had won the right to vote (sometimes only in a limited fashion, like voting in local elections).
Votes for Women’s stance is that it needs both – after all, the game is lost for the suffragist player if their lobbying fails to get the federal amendment through Congress, but to win, they need the strength amassed in dozens of local campaigns to have the amendment ratified in enough states. The game, however, makes a statement about timing: While it is possible for the suffragist to have Congress pass the 19th Amendment in the mid-game already, that is a decidedly risky strategy which gives the Opposition a lot of opportunity to snatch individual states and rack up the necessary 13 rejections which mean the failure of the amendment. The ideal move for the suffragist is to build up the strength in the states as much as possible before pushing Congress into action as late as possible. While that is not without its risks (Opposition can still try to throw wrenches in the wheels of congressional action), it spreads them more evenly between federal and local action.
As mentioned above, equal suffrage spread from the American West and Midwest. It had a much harder time in the Northeast and in southern states – like Tennessee. The southern states were not only more conservative in general, suffragists also faced specific obstacles there: Many southern whites remained committed to the cause of white supremacy after the defeat of the Confederacy in the Civil War. Enfranchising women would give the right to vote to black as well as white women, and in the mind of the white supremacists, white women would be much less likely to actually exercise it (be it because they, as “proper” women, would rely on their men to represent them, or because they would not go to a polling station where they might meet with Black Americans). Others, while generally in favor of women’s suffrage, resented the method: After the Civil War, the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments had enshrined certain rights (including male voting) for Black Americans in the Constitution. Federal amendments were thus unpopular with many southern whites.
As The Woman’s Hour details, this provided for a lot of traction for the anti movement in Tennessee. Activists like Nina Pinckard and Josephine Pearson railed against carpet-bagging outsiders swooping down from the North to meddle with Tennessee’s affairs, warned of impending “negro domination”, and appealed to the chivalry of southern men to rescue their women from being thrown into the dirty cesspit of politics. That they themselves were knee-deep in that cesspit – after all, they were political activists! – bothered them as much as modern-day “tradwives” are bothered by the fact that their plea for women to be submissive to and dependent on their men is at odds with their often successful social media enterprises.
Somewhat counter-intuitively, many women opposed women’s suffrage on moral or political grounds. Votes for Women does a great job in showing the multi-facetedness of the anti movement beyond the male political and business establishment.
Inherent contradictions aside, the antis’ arguments needed to be countered by the suffs. Many of the white suffragists were willing to make rhetorical or substantial compromises: One of NAWSA’s most-cited statistics in the Tennessee campaign was that the number of white women in the south exceeded that of black men and women combined. Enfranchising women, so the more-or-less subtle subtext, would thus not threaten white supremacy – it might even strengthen it. In the end, the tacit agreement was like that found after the Reconstruction amendments designed to protect Black Americans’ rights in the South: The women’s suffrage amendment made its way into the constitution. Yet voting rights were overseen by the individual states, and federal institutions looked the other way about the blatant disenfranchisement of black voters in the South until the Voting Rights Act almost half a century later.
Neither The Woman’s Hour nor Votes for Women shies away from this uncomfortable part of the women’s suffrage movement: The protagonists of the movement are not portrayed as infallible saints in the book. While they held wildly progressive views for their time on women’s suffrage, their stances on issues of race and class were often more in keeping with those of their contemporaries. They also made tactical mistakes, like Carrie Chapman Catt railing against outsiders trying to influence Tennessee – a charge that was immediately turned against her, a Northerner herself, and restricted her visibility for the remainder of the campaign. And most of them were willing to make compromises for the cause of women’s suffrage – sometimes with themselves (Carrie Chapman Catt supported the US effort in World War I against her pacifist convictions lest the women’s suffrage movement be branded unpatriotic), and sometimes at the expense of others. In short, they were human.
Would the 19th Amendment have passed in Tennessee if the suffragists had been less willing to assuage the fears of southern whites about “black domination”? – Probably not – maybe another state could have become the decisive 36th then, but all likely options had been exhausted before. Did the Black Americans in the South, men and women, suffer from the continued disenfranchisement after 1920? – Undoubtedly.
The South is notoriously tough for the suffragists. Placing a ton of cubes there (plus some additional perks) is a tempting proposition.
Suffragist players in Votes for Women face the same strategic and ethical question (of course, with infinitely lower stakes): One of the most powerful cards in the game is The Southern Strategy which places an immense amount of suffragist influence in the South (representing the union between suffragists and white supremacists). It does open the suffragist for some counter-plays from the opposition, though. Savvy suffragist players might hold the card from turn to turn to play it as late as possible, as an uncounterable stratagem in the final struggle for women’s suffrage. Victories won that way have an odd aftertaste, I assure you.
Since Votes for Women has been released, it’s been in the top 5 of games I have played most often. And while I rarely re-read books, especially non-fiction (because there are always intriguing new books to read), I have come back to The Woman’s Hour and have now both read the physical book and listened to the (excellent) audiobook production. Besides all their worthy exploration and analysis of history, that speaks to both the game and the book being excellently crafted, incredibly engaging pinnacles of their respective medium.
With this My Favorite Wargame Cards Series, I hope to take a look at a specific card from the various wargames that I have played and share how it is used in the game. I am not a strategist and frankly I am not that good at games but I do understand how things should work and be used in games. With that being said, here is the next entry in this series.
Card #68: Usurper Emperor from Barbarians at the Gates, The Decline and Fall of the Western Roman Empire 337 – 476 from Compass Games
Barbarians at the Gates, The Decline and Fall of the Western Roman Empire 337 – 476 from Compass Games is a Card Driven Game for two players set during the final hundred plus years of the Western Roman Empire as the Barbarian tribes in the north came down with a vengeance as they clashed with civilization and carved out their place amongst it. The time period covered in the game is from the death of Constantine the Great (337 AD) to the deposition of the last Western Roman Emperor by Odoacer in 476 AD. The Roman player will command the Roman Legions loyal to the failing central authority and those Germanic peoples who have settled peacefully inside the Roman Empire, while the Barbarian player leads Usurper Emperors, and controls the migrations of the Germanic peoples, who are the Barbarians at the Gates. This game is really quite good and feels very much like a wargame even though it is a Card Driven Game. There are lots of opportunities for troop movement, combat and maneuver. And I really liked that. The game is a Card Driven Game and the use of cards is all important and very well done. Each player has their own unique deck of cards that are used and these cards are sometimes removed from those decks when played for an event and also new cards will be added to the deck after each turn. The cards played during a player’s impulse which are not used for the Event are then used for their Operation Points value. These Operation Points can be used for many purposes including Activating a leader, Forced Marches, Raiding, Reinforcement, Migration and Successful Usurpation.
The real trick to the cards is to plan out how you are going to use them to your advantage but also how best to use them. Activating Leaders is very important as you can then move them to attack, defend, change control of areas and other actions. Activating a leader depends on their strategy rating (the lower the strategy rating, the better). When a leader activates from a card, they receive a number of Action Points which can be used for movement (1 over highway, 2 over rough or river connections, 3 over strait or for naval movement), continuation after battle (a kind of advance after combat), changing control over unfortified spaces and sieges of fortified spaces. But the cards also are very mean spirited. What do I mean by this? Well, in our first play, I was carefully using my cards to build up my armies to fend off the initial attacks of the Barbarian hordes. I also had begun to build somewhat of a super stack as well to attempt to foray into England and take on the Barbarians there. As I did this building up, I was unaware of the nasty nature of some of the cards. Some of the cards, both for the Barbarians and Romans, allow a play that will turn a single leader and their entire stack into either a Usurper or a Pacified Barbarian Settlement. Both are equally nasty and you have to keep in mind that you can have your best armies simply taken from you and turned to your enemy.
Some of the cards, both for the Barbarians and Romans, allow a play that will turn a single leader and their entire stack into either a Usurper or a Pacified Barbarian Settlement. Both are equally nasty and you have to keep in mind that you can have your best armies simply taken from you and turned to your enemy. Because of this, the Roman player has to decide whether they will group Combat Units under a single leader in order to face the mighty Barbarian challengers at the Gates in which case he risks that leader to Usurp, or to disperse these troops over several stacks never allowing a single leader to amass too many CU but on the other hand also never having a true striking force to attack with. There is an exception here though as an Emperor leader cannot Usurp and you don’t have to worry about that but this is also dangerous as you can lose that Emperor.
Likewise, once they have an Usurper leader on the board the Barbarian player will try to group all Usurper CU with this leader (in order to keep this force strong and in order to allow their Barbarian CU, leader and tribes to march unopposed into the Empire). This creates a very real and historical danger as the Barbarian player is incentivized to do what an Usurper would historically have done and empty the border garrisons in order to march on Rome.
These type of cards are extremely strong and a situation can occur in which most of the Romans still on the board are Usurper leaders and CU. But there is an action that allows for the Roman player to counter these cards and that is the Successful Usurpation action. If the Barbarian player over does it with the Usurper powers, the Roman player can simply steal these conquests by swapping the Roman power for the Usurper power. This in effect has the Usurpation process succeed and the former Usurper leader now becomes the true Emperor!
Usurper emperors in history, particularly in Ancient Rome, were rulers who seized their power illegitimately, often times via a military rebellion rather than legal succession, and were labeled “tyrants” if defeated, or emperors if successful. They were most common during crises and times of turmoil, such as the “Year of the Four Emperors” in 69 AD following the suicide of Nero, often relying on legionary support and issuing their own coins to legitimize authority.
Emperor Galba by Paulus Moreelse (left); with Emperor Marcus Salvius Otho by Gerrit van Honthorst (center left); with Emperor Vitellius by Hendrick Goltzius (center-right); and Emperor Vespasian (far right).
Usurpation was common during the whole imperial era; virtually all imperial dynasties rose to power through usurpation and conspiracies. The “imperial office” established by Augustus never defined an stable system of succession, and emperors often had to rely solely on military power to survive.
In the Eastern Roman Empire (395–1453), rebellion and usurpation were so notoriously frequent as compared to medieval West, where usurpation was rare, that the modern term “byzantine” became a byword for political intrigue and conspiracy.
Here is a look at our unboxing video:
We also did a video review and you can watch that at the following link:
With this new My Favorite Wargame Cards Series, I hope to take a look at a specific card from the various wargames that I have played and share how it is used in the game. I am not a strategist and frankly I am not that good at games but I do understand how things should work and be used in games. With that being said, here is the next entry in this series.
#67: Frederick Douglas from Votes for Women from Fort Circle Games
Votes for Women is a very interesting card-driven game that covers the American Women’s Suffrage Movement from 1848-1920, culminating in the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment which granted women the right to vote. The game is a 2-player game, that has a fully developed solitaire mode with an “Oppobot” and offers a cooperative mode for those who don’t wish to play as they Opposition. The Suffragist player will have to push Congress to propose the Nineteenth Amendment, and then focus on campaigning to have a minimum of 36 states to ratify the Amendment. The Opposition side will try to prevent Congress from proposing the amendment and failing that to have 13 states reject the amendment.
The game uses cards in a fairly traditional CDG way as there are events that can be be taken or the cards can be played to do things like Campaign, Organize or Lobby Congress. Each card has a specific Card Era that is used to create of the each players’ Draw Decks. Late cards will be on the bottom of the deck, Middle cards will be in the middle of the deck and Early cards will be on the top of the deck. The Suffragist and Opposition decks each have one Start card that will be placed in the player’s hand at the start of the game. Some Event Cards have a prerequisite and some of the cards require a player to roll a 6-sided die and only take the the action on a roll of 3-6. Otherwise, the Event Card is discarded with no effect. The cards in this game are also steeped in historical details, from the name of the events that tie back to specific individuals or happenings, to major moments in the struggle. This game is about the history of the struggle for the right to vote and it is very good!
I like to see Votes for Women as a game primarily as it uses some really fun and lite methods to determine the majority control in various states. One of the goals of the game is for either side to place out their influence cubes in the states in order to collect State cards that provide unique and sometimes very powerful free ways to add more influence or otherwise change the level of influence in states. This goal also leads all the way to the end game as if when the 19th Amendment is ratified in Congress because the Suffragist player used their cards to place out support cylinders in Congress each of the states can have their support for the amendment decided at that time if there are 4 or more influence cubes of either side in that state. If there are 4 cubes in a state at that time either a green check mark will be placed, representing support for the 19th Amendment or an orange X will be placed meaning the state voted against.
The Frederick Douglas card is one of these methods used to shake things up a bit and give the Suffragist player a chance to push their luck and roll the die to see how many influence cubes they can place. The card text instructs the player to roll a D8 (the game uses D6’s, D8’s and D12’s) and then add that number of influence cubes in the Northeast region, which includes states such as New York, New Jersey, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut. The key limiter here though is that no more than 1 cube per state can be placed. The other thing about placing these influence cubes is that you can use 1 cube to remove a cube of the opposing player. This action does not allow you to then place one of your cubes in the state if that action would remove the only Opposition cube in the state…but nice try!
Frederick Douglass was a staunch, lifelong advocate for women’s suffrage, viewing it as an essential component of human equality, famously declaring “Right is of no sex”. As a key ally to suffragists like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, he supported the cause for over four decades, including crucial support at the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention.
In an issue of the North Star published shortly after the convention, Douglass wrote:
In respect to political rights, we hold woman to be justly entitled to all we claim for man. We go farther, and express our conviction that all political rights which it is expedient for man to exercise, it is equally so for women. All that distinguishes man as an intelligent and accountable being, is equally true of woman; and if that government is only just which governs by the free consent of the governed, there can be no reason in the world for denying to woman the exercise of the elective franchise, or a hand in making and administering the laws of the land. Our doctrine is, that “Right is of no sex.”
Douglass continued to support the cause of women after the 1848 convention. In 1866 Douglass, along with Stanton and Anthony, founded the American Equal Rights Association, an organization that demanded universal suffrage. Though the group disbanded just three years later due to growing tension between women’s rights activists and Africa-American rights activists, Douglass remained influential in both movements, championing the cause of equal rights until his death in 1895.
Here is a link to our full video review of the game:
With this My Favorite Wargame Cards Series, I hope to take a look at a specific card from the various wargames that I have played and share how it is used in the game. I am not a strategist and frankly I am not that good at games but I do understand how things should work and be used in games. With that being said, here is the next entry in this series.
Card #66: Harwood’s Intuition from The Hunt from Salt & Pepper Games
I have played several hidden movement games over the years and enjoyed them all. Some of these titles have included wargames such as They Come Unseen from Osprey Games, Sniper Elite: The Board Game from Rebellion Unplugged and Bomber Command from GMT Games as well as a few board games including Hunt for the Ring from Ares Games. The concept of moving cautiously, attempting to evade pursuers, all while trying to locate and acquire or destroy objectives makes for a very interesting gaming experience. These situations can make for some really tense games that cause your head to ache and your wits to be tested. But they rely on some bluffing as well. Trying to force your opponent to anticipate where they think you should be and then trying not to be there. A really great mechanic in board games but not always easy to pull off and make for a very playable and interesting game. In 2022, we played a new design from Matthias Cramer and Engin Kunter that took this hidden movement concept and put it into a historically based game about the struggle over control of the South Atlantic between the British Royal Navy and the German Kriegsmarine during the early years of World War II called The Hunt from Salt & Pepper Games.
The Hunt is a Card Driven Game where the German player has to attempt to stay hidden while trying to sink merchant shipping as the Royal Navy hunts for them throughout the South Atlantic. The players each have asymmetric actions to use to accomplish their missions and each has a tough time doing what they have to do. But, if they manage their cards wisely, using them as effectively as possible, they can successfully either evade their pursuer or catch their prey.
In today’s post, we will take a look at the very useful British card Harwood’s Intuition. Harwood’s Intuition is a 5 Ops card, which makes it a very important card in the British deck as it allows for the taking of 2-3 actions in a single turn, but for which there is an even more important use as an ambush by playing it as a Reaction to a German action. If the German player ever searches for a Freight Ship in a space where there is a British Task Force, and Harwood’s Intuition is played as a reaction, the British will get a free Search action with a +1 DRM to the roll. Normally, a Search requires a 5+ on a d6 to be successful, but with this bonus +1 that will mean success on a 4+ which is a 50/50 proposition. And remember, the point of the game for the British is to find and sink the Graf Spee at the Battle of the River Plate. Such as tasty surprise card for the British! I know that when I play as the Germans, I have to always keep in the back of my mind that this card exists and that if there is a Force present, I have a risk of being ambushed. This is one of the elements that makes this game so good.
The Battle of the River Plate was fought in the South Atlantic on December 13, 1939 and was officially the first British naval battle of World War II. In the months leading up to this infamous date, due to several successful sinkings of merchant shipping by the Graf Spee, the Royal Navy was ordered by Admiral Sir Henry Harwood Harwood to keep observation between Medanos and Cape San Antonio located off the coast of Argentina south of the River Plate estuary. In the lead up to the climactic final battle, following various raider-warning radio messages from the merchantman Doric Star, which was sunk by Admiral Graf Spee off South Africa, Harwood suspected that the raider would try to strike next at the merchant shipping off the River Plate estuary between Uruguay and Argentina. He ordered his squadron to steam toward the position 32° south, 47° west. Harwood chose that position, according to his dispatch, because it was the most congested part of the shipping routes in the South Atlantic and therefore the point at which a raider could do the most damage to enemy shipping. A Norwegian freighter saw Admiral Graf Spee practicing the use of her searchlights and radioed that her course was toward South America; the three available cruisers of Force G rendezvoused off the estuary on December 12th and conducted maneuvers.
Though generally considered a river, the River Plate has been considered by some geographers as a large bay or a marginal sea of the South Atlantic. Principally this is due to the River Plates enormous width, if we are considering it a river the widest in the world, with a maximum width of about 140 miles. Acting as the marine border between Argentina and Uruguay, the River Plate was a main artery of maritime trade and a gateway into the interior of the South American continent.
It was here that Harwood predicted the German raider would strike and his assumption made sense. The River Plate’s Estuary acted as a natural bottleneck for ships with perilous tides and sandbanks additionally hampering any ability for a British Merchant vessel to escape the guns of a German raider. So it was near the Estuary of the River Plate that Harwood’s H.M.S Exeter, Ajax and Achilles would make their stand. With their force concentrated here, on December 12th preparations were made and tactics drawn up in anticipation for an arriving adversary and to spring the trap and catch the elusive Admiral Graf Spee off-guard and send her to the bottom.
Here also is a link to our full video review of the game:
The 2026 Winter Olympics have put fresh attention on winter sports. From the flashy ones like ski jumping and snowboarding to the elegant ones like figure skating. There are also some that get recognized with a sort of, ‘oh yeah, that’s an Olympic sport isn’t it?’ I feel like biathlon falls into this latter category. […]
Folge 37 folgt den Druiden aus THE DRUIDS OF EDORA nach Paris, den dort ist unser zweites Schwerpunktspiel, BOHEMIANS, thematisch eingeordnet. Zusätzlich erzählen wir von dem gemeinsamen Besuch der AÖU-Con und worauf wir (gerne) für das Spielen verzichten.
Kann sich Spielegeschichte wiederholen? Auf der weltgrößten Publikumsmesse für Brettspiele in seiner Originalversion vorgestellt, dann nur begrenzt verfügbar und zudem mit Detailmängeln behaftet, die mir erst nach der Neuheiten-Euphorie aufgefallen sind. Ich hoffe auf eine redaktionelle Überarbeitung in der lokalisierten Version, die beim Fast-Namensvetter First Contact versäumt wurde. Ereilt 1ers Contacts ein vergleichbares Schicksal?
Da gab es 2018 auf der SPIEL in Essen die eine Messeüberraschung in Form von First Contact, die für mich damals alles an Neuheiten überstrahlte. Autor Damir Khusnatdinov hatte die Idee von Codenames weiterentwickelt und in ein thematisches Szenario rund um altägyptische Gelehrte in Kontakt mit einer rätselhaften Alienrasse gegossen. Es ging um Kommunikation und Verständnis mittels einer gemeinsamen Sprache, die wir im Spielverlauf erst noch entwickeln mussten. Erinnerte mich extrem an den Kinofilm Arrival. Im Übereifer bezeichnete ich First Contacts damals als den kommenden Codenames-Killer. Allerdings mit einem Fragezeichen hinter dieser Aussage versehen.
Diese Fragezeichen wurden schließlich zur Realität. Ein Jahr später, als der erste Hype um First Contacts längst vorbei war, veröffentlichte Huch eine deutschsprachige Version. Redaktionell und grafisch nur wenig überarbeitet. Grundsätzlich blieb alles wie von der Originalversion gewohnt und die zeigte in meinen Spielpartien nach der SPIEL 2018 leider etliche Ecken und Kanten, die ich in der Messe-Euphorie der kurzen Anspielsession mit dem Autor nicht bemerkt hatte. Meine Hoffnung war deshalb, dass eine erfahrene Redaktion sich dem Spiel annimmt, alle wesentlichen Stellen nochmals hinterfragt und optimiert. Das ist leider nicht passiert und seitdem habe ich das Spiel auch nicht mehr auf irgendeinem Spieltisch gesehen. Meine Originalversion hatte ich derzeit längst verkauft. Codenames wird hingegen in meinen Runden weiterhin gespielt.
Was blieb, das war meine leichte Enttäuschung über First Contact, denn das Grundprinzip finde ich weiterhin toll. Nur die Umsetzung, wegen der den Spielablauf aushebelnden Zufallstreffer und auch im Handling mit den zu drehenden Karten, hatte ihre Schwächen. Diese und weitere Schwächen hat auch der Autor Damir Khusnatdinov erkannt und unter dem Titel „First Contact: The Second Coming“ eine überarbeitete Version geplant. Im Zuge von Corona wurde das Projekt pausiert, aber im Herbst 2021 wieder aufgenommen. Ein Jahr später dann das bisher letzte Lebenszeichen von dem Spiel: „The project is still ‚on pause‘ … We hope, project will return with new features soon.“
Das ist nun mehr als drei Jahre her. Die Zukunft einer generalüberholten Neuauflage von First Contact ist mehr als ungewiss. Dabei klang das alles doch mehr als gut: „We tried to pay attention to all questions and suggestions from players in First Contact original game. So this time we made gameplay more diverse and deep, managed to solve the problem of active involvement of all players in each round, and in the end our game is more competitive now.“ Derweil sind First Contact und auch The Second Coming längst vergessen, sofern die überhaupt wirklich Beachtung fanden.
Sprung zurück in die Gegenwart zu einem ganz anderen Spiel mit zufällig ähnlichem Namen. Mit 1ers Contacts hat Autor Michael Munoz auf der SPIEL 2025 in Essen ebenfalls einen Überraschungserfolg gelandet. Das Hidden-Movement-Spiel war aus dem Nichts plötzlich auf Platz 1 der Fairplay-Scoutliste emporgestiegen. Ansonsten hätte ich es in der Neuheitenflut völlig übersehen. Vor Ort anspielt, eine Menge Spaß mit einer bunt zusammengewürfelten Runde etlicher Nationen erlebt und spontan in der Deluxe-Version mit Plexiglas-Suchrahmen als Add-on-Element gekauft. Das liegt nun auch schon wieder drei Monate zurück.
Derweil konnte ich 1ers Contacts in vier verschiedenen Spielrunden erleben. Sofern meine Mitspieler das 1vsX-Spielprinzip mit Deduktionselementen der gemeinsamen Spurensuche und Treibjagd möchten, kam es in Summe mittelmäßig bis gut an. Wirkliche Euphorie habe ich hingegen nur in einzelnen Spielmomenten gespürt. Das Spiel trägt leider bleischwer und lähmend und meiner Meinung nach zu unrecht die plakative Einordnung als Scotland Yard Klone. Das erzeugt allzu oft Bilder und Erinnerungen im Kopf, die zu einer ablehnenden Grundhaltung führen, bevor 1ers Contacts überhaupt selbst gespielt wurde. Zudem mag nicht jeder kooperative Spiele und Deduktion wird oftmals als anstrengend empfunden.
Dazu kommt, dass es einem 1ers Contacts nach meinen bisherigen Spielerfahrungen und Erklärungen nicht wirklich einfach macht. Die Anleitung ist eher geschwätzig als konkret und konfus anstatt übersichtlich geordnet. Einige Details sind nur in den Beispielen erwähnt und grundlegende Informationen fehlen völlig. Wie sollen die „Detection Tokens“ verwendet werden? Steht dort nicht, wo ich mindestens eine Empfehlung erwartet hätte. Wie wird der Spielausgang bewertet, wenn keine Seite ihr Spielzeit erreicht hat? Ein Unentschieden kennt das Regelwerk nicht. Alles scheint aus einer wissenden Perspektive beschrieben zu sein, sodass viele Fragen schlicht offen bleiben und von der Spielrunde selbst geregelt werden müssen. Nicht jede Runde kommt damit zurecht, wie selbst erlebt.
Es geht mit meiner Kritik leider noch weiter: Die beiliegenden Szenarien in ihren Umschlägen mit Klebepunkt (zum Glück rückstandslos lösbar) unterscheiden nicht wirklich zwischen atmosphärischer Hintergrundgeschichte und spielmechanischen Details. Etliches ist arg vage und schlicht ungenau gehalten, was wohl auch der Übersetzung vom französischen Original in die englische Version geschuldet ist. Inzwischen gibt es eine offizielle FAQ auf Boardgamegeek und der Autor Michael Munoz ist sehr bemüht, die vielen Regel- und Verständnisfragen zu beantworten. Wer sich da selbst mit einiges an Eigeninitiative durchbeißen möchte, dem kann ich die Erstauflage in der Deluxe-Version direkt vom Verlag Explor8 empfehlen. Die bietet doppelt so viele Szenarien und Agenten wie die normal im Handel erhältliche Version. Ansonsten wartet auf eine lokalisierte Ausgabe, die dann hoffentlich auch redaktionell überarbeitet ist, sofern sich ein Verlag diesem Spiel annimmt.
Nach der SPIEL 2025 hatte ich gefragt: Eventuell das beste Spiel der Messe? Derweil meine ich mit etwas Abstand, dass 1ers Contacts durchaus besonders und spielenswert ist in der richtigen Spielrunde, die das eigentlich flotte Vergnügen nicht durch eine über-analytische Spielweise zerdenkt. Zum Prädikat „bestes Spiel der Messe“ fehlt im Detailblick aber noch einiges an redaktioneller Arbeit, um den Spieleinstieg zu glätten und das richtige Spielverständnis zu ermöglichen. Sozusagen ein Rohdiamant, dem professionelle Schleifarbeit der unschön abstehenden Ecken und Kanten guttun würde.
Allerdings droht das Spiel vorab in der Vergessenheit zu versinken, denn unter 1st Contact werdet Ihr es nicht finden. Ihr müsst schon nach dem französischen Originalnamen 1ers Contacts suchen. Erleidet es ein vergleichbares Schicksal wie sein Fast-Namensvetter First Contact? Ich hoffe nicht, denn es wäre schade um die Spielerfahrung, die Ihr Euch nicht entgehen lassen solltet.
Düster, spannend und erbarmungslos – in Terrorscape werden die Spieler in eine bedrohliche Villa geworfen, in der sie sich vor einem furchteinflößenden Killer verstecken müssen. Der besondere Reiz liegt in der Asymmetrie: Einer jagt, die anderen verstecken sich, und niemand weiß genau, wo der andere gerade ist. Zwei bis vier Spieler können sich ins Abenteuer stürzen, wobei bis zu drei Überlebende gemeinsam gegen einen Killer antreten. Eine Partie dauert etwa 30 bis 60 Minuten. Die empfohlene Altersgrenze liegt offiziell bei 14 Jahren, wobei sich je nach Gruppe auch eher eine Empfehlung ab 16 Jahren anbieten würde – denn das Thema ist nichts für Zartbesaitete.
Bereits beim ersten Anblick überzeugt Terrorscape durch seine eindrucksvolle Tischpräsenz. Zwischen den Spielenden steht eine dreidimensionale Pappvilla als Sichtschutz mit integriertem Würfelturm und Ablageflächen. Diese ungewöhnliche Kulisse zieht sofort in ihren Bann und schafft eine passende Atmosphäre für das Spielgeschehen.
Spielerisch ist Terrorscape überraschend zugänglich. Die Spieler übernehmen die Rolle von Reisenden, die in einem schweren Gewitter Schutz suchen und sich plötzlich mit einem Killer konfrontiert sehen. Die Überlebenden spielen kooperativ, entweder jeder einen einzelnen Charakter oder ein Spieler mehrere. Es gilt, gemeinsam die Villa zu verlassen – entweder durch die Reparatur eines Funkgeräts oder durch das Auffinden von fünf Schlüsseln, die die Vordertür entsperren. Ist man besonders aufmerksam, lässt sich unter Umständen sogar ein Hinterausgang entdecken.
Jede Figur führt in ihrem Zug eine Aktion aus. Man kann sich bewegen, Angstmarker ablegen, Spezialaktionen ausführen, Blockaden entfernen, das Funkgerät reparieren oder nach Schlüsseln suchen. Einige dieser Aktionen verursachen Lärm – dies ist die entscheidende Information für den Killer-Spieler, um mögliche Aufenthaltsorte der Überlebenden einzugrenzen. Wird beispielsweise im Wohnzimmer eine laute Aktion ausgeführt, erhält der Killer die entsprechende Information, ohne zu wissen, wer dort aktiv war.
Nach jeder Runde zieht ein ausgewählter Überlebender zwei Karten vom Entdeckungsdeck und darf einen Gegenstand behalten. Diese Objekte können situationsbedingt sehr nützlich sein und bilden einen zusätzlichen Anreiz zum Erkunden.
Der Killer wiederum agiert über ein individuelles Kartendeck, das zu einem von drei enthaltenen Killertypen gehört: Der Schlächter ist brutal, laut und blockiert Wege. Der Mörder agiert schleichend und kann sich verdeckt bewegen. Der Geist setzt auf psychologischen Terror und bringt seine Opfer durch Angst zur Strecke. Jeder dieser Killer spielt sich grundlegend anders, was die Wiederspielbarkeit erhöht und unterschiedliche taktische Herangehensweisen ermöglicht.
Im Spielzug des Killers kommen verschiedene Kartentypen zum Einsatz. Zunächst können schnelle gelbe Fähigkeiten aktiviert werden, danach eine blaue Fähigkeit oder alternativ zwei normale Aktionen – meist Bewegung und Suche. Wird niemand gefunden, kann abschließend noch eine langsame grüne Fähigkeit ausgespielt werden. Ein zentraler Bestandteil ist die Suche nach den Überlebenden. Sobald sich der Killer in einem Raum befindet und die Aktion „Suchen“ ausführt, muss er erfragen, ob sich jemand dort aufhält. Ist das der Fall, kommt es zur Auseinandersetzung. Dabei entscheidet ein direkter Vergleich von Angriff und Verteidigung über das Ergebnis. Gelingt dem Killer ein Treffer, wird die Zielperson verletzt. Zwei Verletzungen bedeuten den sofortigen Tod – und mit dem Tod eines einzigen Überlebenden endet das Spiel zugunsten des Killers.
Die Kartenmechanik hat zusätzlich taktische Tiefe. Manche Karten müssen durch das Abwerfen anderer Karten „bezahlt“ werden. Wird das Nachziehdeck leer, wird der Ablagestapel gemischt, zugleich steigt jedoch der Level des Killers. Dadurch wird dieser mächtiger und kann unter Umständen neue, stärkere Karten seinem Repertoire hinzufügen.
Ergänzend zum Basisspiel bietet Terrorscape auch einige Varianten, die das Spielgefühl verändern. Eigenschaftskarten können einmalig aktiviert werden und verleihen beiden Seiten Sonderfähigkeiten. In der Variante „Getrennte Wege“ spielt jeder Überlebende für sich und gewinnt alleine. Noch taktischer wird es mit den Überlebensplänen: Erfüllen Überlebende bestimmte Aufgaben, dürfen sie neue Fähigkeiten freischalten – oder sogar den Killer zur Strecke bringen. Diese Varianten lassen sich auch miteinander kombinieren.
Terrorscape bringt viel Atmosphäre an den Tisch, aber nicht alles ist perfekt. Trotz stimmungsvoller Ausstattung und durchdachter Spielmechanik waren nicht alle Partien gleichermaßen spannend. Gerade beim Spielen mit dem Schlächter empfand ich es als schwierig, als Killer effektiv zum Ziel zu kommen – es sei denn, man hatte schlichtweg Glück bei der Ortung der Überlebenden. Manche Partien wirken unausgewogen, was gerade zu Beginn problematisch sein kann, wenn man als Killer die möglichen Gegenstände und Aktionen der Überlebenden (noch) nicht kennt.
Dann kann es frustrierend sein, wenn die Gegenseite Dinge tun oder erreichen kann, die sich aus Perspektive des Killers nur schwer nachvollziehen lassen.
Trotz dieser Kritikpunkte hatte ich immer wieder Lust auf weitere Runden. Die Abwechslung durch verschiedene Killer, die Sondervarianten und die unterschiedlichen Fähigkeiten der Überlebenden sorgen für langfristige Motivation. Wer noch mehr Tiefe sucht, bekommt mittlerweile auch Erweiterungen – ein zweiter Teil ist ebenfalls angekündigt.
Das Spielmaterial ist insgesamt gelungen, die Ausstattung unterstreicht die thematische Immersion. Eine große Ausnahme bildet allerdings der beigelegte Würfelturm. Die Idee, ihn in das große 3D-Element einzubauen, ist hervorragend. Die Umsetzung hingegen ist misslungen. Häufig bleiben Würfel stecken und kommen nicht heraus – was Schütteln, Klopfen oder Nachwürfeln nötig macht. Im schlimmsten Fall muss der Turm aus dem Sichtschirm entfernt werden, um die Würfel zu befreien. Für ein Spiel mit dieser Ausstattung ist das schlicht eine Fehlkonstruktion. Ich persönlich nutze künftig einen Würfelteller.
Terrorscape ist kein Spiel, das regelmäßig auf den Tisch muss – aber eines, das in unregelmäßigen Abständen immer wieder Spaß macht, sobald man bereit ist, sich erneut in die düstere Villa zu wagen. Die Regeln sind eingängig genug, um nach einer längeren Pause schnell wieder ins Spiel zu finden. Dank Atmosphäre, stimmiger Gestaltung und abwechslungsreichem Gameplay wird es seinen festen Platz in meinem Regal behalten – auch wenn es kein durchweg perfektes Spiel ist. Das Potenzial und die erzählerische Kraft sind dennoch groß.
Anmelden
.jpg)
